Comparing 10GBASE-T and SFP+ for 10GbE Data Center Cabling

Updated on Jan 5, 2022 by

10g sfp+

When considering cabling solutions for a 10GB Ethernet network, the choice between 10GBASE-T and SFP+ is crucial. This article will compare these two options, occasionally mentioning DAC and AOC, to help you make an informed decision that aligns with your network requirements.


Although fiber cable has a much longer reach (with 10GBASE-T losing efficiency over 20 metres) and reduced electromagnetic interference, copper cable is still popular for its reliability and cost-effectiveness. This is also true in the 10GbE network too. 10GBASE-T copper and SFP+ are the two most popular kinds of connection of physical media to your 10GbE network. This article will clarify the differences between 10GBASE-T and 10G SFP + from different perspectives.


10GBASE-T is a 10 Gigabit Ethernet standard that supports data transfer rates up to 10 Gbps over traditional twisted-pair copper wires. 10GBASE-T is connected through RJ45 connectors and can automatically negotiate between 1 and 10 gigabit rates. It uses block coding technology to transmit data over cables with good bit error rates.


SFP+ is a miniaturized hot-swappable fiber optic module interface designed to support 10 Gbps fiber optic communication. The SFP + module uses fiber optic transmission to transmit data, providing lower latency and longer transmission distance. It supports different types of connections such as fiber optic jumpers, DAC (direct cable), and AOC (active cable).


10GBASE-T vs. SFP+

By Backward Compatibility


  • Backward Compatibility: 10GBASE-T copper cabling is highly backward compatible with standard copper network devices, maximizing the utilization of existing infrastructure.

  • RJ45 Connector: Utilizing the familiar RJ45 connector, 10GBASE-T ports can seamlessly connect to 1 gigabit and even 100 megabit interfaces, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of devices.

  • Legacy Equipment Connectivity: Direct Attached Cables (DACs) are limited to connecting with 10GbE switches and cannot be used to connect to legacy equipment, posing a limitation in compatibility.


  • Flexibility in Transceivers: SFP+ ports offer flexibility in transceiver options, allowing for the insertion of 1 gigabit transceivers that can operate at lower speeds when connected to legacy ports via fiber cable.

  • Support for Legacy Ports: SFP modules supporting 1GBase-T can also be inserted into SFP+ ports to connect to legacy ports at slower speeds, providing compatibility with older network infrastructure.

By Power Consumption


  • Higher Power Consumption: The 10GBASE-T solution consumes significantly more power compared to SFP+ solutions, typically three to four times more.

  • Power Consumption Variability: The power consumption of 10GBASE-T varies depending on the distance of the cable, ranging from 2 to 5 watts per port at each end of the cable.

  • Impact in Data Centers: In a typical data center with thousands of cables installed, the higher power consumption of 10GBASE-T can result in increased operational costs and management complexities over time.


  • Lower Power Consumption: SFP+ solutions, on the other hand, consume around 0.7 watts per port regardless of the distance of the cable, significantly lower than 10GBASE-T.

  • Long-Term Cost Savings: Opting for SFP+ solutions in data centers can lead to substantial cost savings and reduced operational headaches in the long run due to their lower power consumption.

By Latency


  • Block Encoding: 10GBASE-T utilizes block encoding to transport data across the cable without errors, adhering to the PHY standard.

  • Latency Specification: The standard specifies a latency of 2.6 microseconds for the transmit-receive pair, with the block size requiring latency to be less than 2 microseconds.


  • Simplified Electronics: SFP+ employs simplified electronics without encoding, resulting in lower latency compared to 10GBASE-T.

  • Typical Latency: The typical latency for SFP+ is around 300 nanoseconds (ns) per link, significantly lower than 10GBASE-T.

While both 10GBASE-T and SFP+ exhibit slight differences in application latency, SFP+ generally offers lower latency compared to 10GBASE-T. High latency can negatively impact CPU performance, thereby limiting data center efficiency and increasing operational costs.


By Application


  • Based on copper cable transmission technology, using Cat6a or Cat7 standard twisted pair cables.

  • Supports transmission distances up to 100 meters, suitable for general work environments and data centers.

  • It requires relatively more power to maintain transmission, so the heat generation and power consumption are relatively high.

  • Usually low cost, easy to deploy, and compatible with existing network infrastructure.

  • Latency is slightly higher than SFP + solution, but has no significant impact on the vast majority of applications.


  • Using fiber optic cables to transmit data is mainly suitable for long-distance or cross-building connections.

  • Provides lower latency and lower power consumption than the 10GBASE-T solution.

  • Compatible with metal-plated direct-connect cables (DAC) or active/passive optical fibers.

  • The distance may vary from a few meters to several kilometers depending on the transmission medium (multimode or single-mode fiber).

  • The cost is usually higher than 10GBASE-T solutions, especially when it comes to single-mode fiber and long-distance connections.

By Cost


  • Cost-Effective Components: SFP+ components are currently priced at $20 per port or lower, making them a cost-effective option for high-speed networking.

  • Affordable Fiber Cables: Fiber cables are also becoming more affordable, approaching the costs of Cat 6a cables, and decreasing in cost as volume grows.

  • Decreasing Solution Costs: As prices for 10 gigabit SFP+ switches, network interface cards (NICs), and Direct Attached Cables (DACs) continue to drop, the overall solution cost becomes increasingly affordable.


  • Cost Considerations: 10GBASE-T typically costs approximately $50 to $100 per port, making it a costlier option compared to SFP+ for small businesses.

  • Future Cost Reductions: With the mass production of 40nm 10GBASE-T, costs are expected to decrease over time, providing potential savings for businesses in the future.

  • Backward Compatibility: 10GBASE-T offers backward compatibility with 1G ports, allowing for seamless integration with existing infrastructure, particularly beneficial for low bandwidth devices still utilizing 1G ports.

By Transmission Distance


  • Limited Distance over Copper: Although 10GBASE-T supports distances up to 100 meters using category 6a or 7 cabling, the transmission distance decreases as the quality of the installed cabling diminishes.

  • Extended Reach Challenges: The reach of 10GBASE-T might not suffice for larger facilities or campuses where longer transmission distances are necessary, making fiber alternatives preferable.


  • Longer Distance Capabilities: SFP+ supports much greater distances when using optical fiber, with potential reach ranging from several hundred meters to tens of kilometers based on the fiber type and quality.

  • Modular Distance Solutions: By selecting different types of optical transceivers, SFP+ can be tailored to fit various distance requirements, providing a high level of versatility for network planning and upgrades.

By Installation Complexity


  • Familiar Cabling Infrastructure: Deployment of 10GBASE-T can leverage existing RJ45 connectors and Ethernet cabling, simplifying the installation process for many organizations.

  • Cost-Effective for Small Upgrades: For small-scale deployments or gradual network upgrades where existing copper infrastructure is present, 10GBASE-T can be more cost-effective and less complex to implement.


  • Technical Considerations for Fiber: Deploying SFP+ with fiber optics can be more complex, requiring careful consideration of transceiver types, fiber cable quality, and optical network planning.

  • Professional Installation Recommended: Due to the precision and expertise needed for fiber installations, professional assistance is often recommended, which may increase initial setup complexity and cost.


The choice between 10GBASE-T and SFP+ depends on specific data center needs. While 10GBASE-T offers simplicity and cost-effectiveness for shorter distances, SFP+ provides lower latency and greater flexibility for long-distance and high-density connections. Considering factors such as latency, power consumption, backward compatibility, cost, transimission distance and installation complexity will help you make the best decision for your data center cabling requirements.

You might be interested in

See profile for Sheldon.
Decoding OLT, ONU, ONT, and ODN in PON Network
Mar 14, 2023
See profile for Irving.
What's the Difference? Hub vs Switch vs Router
Dec 17, 2021
See profile for Sheldon.
What Is SFP Port of Gigabit Switch?
Jan 6, 2023
See profile for Migelle.
PoE vs PoE+ vs PoE++ Switch: How to Choose?
May 30, 2024
See profile for Moris.
How Much Do You Know About Power Cord Types?
Sep 29, 2021