TOR
What is TOR (Top of Rack)?
TOR (Top of Rack) refers to a network architecture where networking equipment, such as switches, is placed at the top of individual racks within a data center or server room. The servers in the racks are connected to the switch through optical fibers or network lines, and the switch is connected to the upper convergent switch. In this case, it is suitable for the situation of more access equipment or a high density of single cabinet equipment. TOR architecture simplifies cabling and provides localized connectivity between servers within the same rack.
Advantages of TOR
-
1. Simplified Cabling: With TOR architecture, the networking equipment is placed at the top of each rack, reducing the length of cables required for connecting servers to the network. This simplifies the cabling infrastructure and makes it easier to manage and maintain.
-
2. Scalability: TOR architecture allows for easy scalability. Additional racks can be added to the data center or server room, and the servers in those racks can be connected to the existing TOR switches. This makes it simpler to expand the network as the needs of the organization grow.
-
3. Localized Connectivity: TOR architecture provides localized connectivity between servers within the same rack. This means that data traffic between servers in the same rack can be kept within the rack, reducing the need for traffic to traverse through the entire network. This can improve performance and reduce latency.
-
4. Flexibility: TOR architecture offers flexibility in terms of equipment placement and server configurations. Each rack can have its own TOR switch, allowing for independent management and customization of the network within each rack. This flexibility can be beneficial for different types of applications or projects with varying network requirements.
-
5. Cost-effectiveness: TOR architecture can be cost-effective, especially in environments with a high density of single cabinet equipment. By placing the networking equipment at the top of each rack, the need for long-distance cabling is reduced, resulting in cost savings on cabling infrastructure.
TOR vs EOR vs MOR
Network Architecture
|
TOR (Top of Rack)
|
EOR (End of Row)
|
MOR (Middle of Row)
|
---|---|---|---|
Location of Switches
|
Top of individual racks
|
End of each row
|
Middle of each row
|
Server-to-Switch Connectivity
|
Direct connection between servers and rack-level switches
|
Servers connect to patch panels, which are connected to row-level switches
|
Servers connect to patch panels, which are connected to row-level switches
|
Number of Switches
|
Each rack has its own dedicated switch
|
Multiple racks share a single switch at the end of the row
|
Multiple racks share a single switch in the middle of the row
|
Cabling Complexity
|
Simplified cabling within individual racks
|
Reduced cabling compared to TOR, but longer cable runs within rows
|
Reduced cabling compared to TOR, shorter cable runs compared to EOR
|
Scalability
|
May require more switches as the number of racks increases
|
Scalable, as additional racks can be connected to the same row-level switch
|
Scalable, as additional racks can be connected to the same row-level switch
|
Cable Management
|
Simplified cable management within individual racks
|
More complex cable management compared to TOR
|
Intermediate complexity in cable management
|
Space Requirement
|
Requires space at the top of each rack for switches
|
Requires space at the end of each row for switches
|
Requires space in the middle of each row for switches
|
Cost Consideration
|
Potentially higher cost due to more switches
|
Potentially lower cost compared to TOR
|
Moderate cost with a balance between TOR and EOR
|
It's important to note that the suitability of each architecture depends on the specific requirements, scale, and constraints of the network infrastructure. The table provides a general comparison, but the final decision should be based on factors such as the size of the data center, number of servers, scalability needs, cabling complexity, available space, and budget considerations.

-
Telecom Rooms Cabling Upgrading Solution
Due to the extended period of use of the telecom room and the continuous evolution of business and associated equipment, maintenance personnel need to constantly adjust the links within the telecom room. FS Telecom Rooms Cabling Upgrading Solution provide
-
Data Center Structured Cabling Solution
Nowadays, the surge of Internet data traffic has promoted the rapid growth of data processing demand and storage demand. Higher speeds and more bandwidth requirements are driving equipment and architecture choices in data center. FS's high-density data c
-
Interconnect Solution for Small and Medium-sized Data Centers
Compared with traditional large-scale data centers, small and medium-sized data centers are more flexible, reliable, and low-cost in deployment under the premise of ensuring enterprise needs. FS's customized data center interconnection solution can promot